Scalia

(PC) Beckett v. Scalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20231:20-cv-01468California1,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW H. BECKETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01468-JLT-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S

v.

FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS

SCALIA, et al., AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

17 Plaintiff Matthew H. Beckett is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 31, 2023, the Court issued its Third Screening Order. (Doc. 29.) The Court found Plaintiff plausibly alleged the following cognizable claims in his second amended complaint: Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Scalia, Madrigal and Hernandez (Claim One); Eighth Amendment failure to protect/failure to intervene claims against Defendant Hackworth (Claim One); and Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.