Prudhel

(PC) Williams v. Prudhel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20232:22-cv-02250California1,081 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY JAMES WILLIAMS, No. 2:22-cv-2250 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOSHUA PRUDHEL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). On March 6, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Having conducted the required screening with respect to plaintiff’s amended complaint, the court finds that plaintiff may proceed on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.