Marsh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 TERRANCE MARSH, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01451-JLT-EPG 9 Plaintiffs, SCREENING ORDER 10 v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO:

FREEDOM MORTGAGE (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

CORPORATION, OR Defendant. (2); NOTIFY THE COURT THAT THEY

WISH TO STAND ON THEIR COMPLAINT

14 (ECF No. 1)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Plaintiffs Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh proceed pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil action. Generally, they allege that Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation violated the 20 Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by providing false information to consumer reporting 21 agencies. The complaint is now before this Court for screening. 22 For the reasons given below, the Court concludes that the complaint does not state any cognizable claims. After Plaintiffs review this order, Plaintiffs may choose to file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Plaintiffs may also notify the Court that they want to stand on their complaint, in which case…