Nash

(PC) Reid v. Nash

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20231:22-cv-00549California2,137 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 WALTER R. REID, Case No. 1:22-cv-00549-ADA-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF

BARRY GREEN,

13 (ECF No. 43) Defendant.

15 Plaintiff Walter R. Reid is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed 16 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 23). The case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Eighth 17 Amendment claim against Defendant Green for deliberate indifference to his serious medical 18 needs. (ECF Nos. 23, 24). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s filing dated November 20, 2023, and 19 docketed with this Court on November 27, 2023 (ECF No. 43.) For the reasons stated below, 20 Court denies requested relief.

I. FIRST MOTION

22 The first motion in the filing is titled “Plaintiff’s Notice and Motion for Objection to In 23 Camera hearing; and Motion to Renew Recommendation for Pro Bono Counsel.” (ECF No. 43, at 24 1). In this Motion, Plaintiff “objects to defendants in camera hearing request if its purpose is 25 being used to weigh evidence and the drawing of legitimate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.