Lemon

(PC) Quintero v. Lemon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20231:23-cv-01233California581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL QUINTERO, No. 1:23-cv-01233-ADA-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

TRISTAIN LEMON, et al. (ECF No. 16) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 27, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff’s motion must be denied. “The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). A party moving for summary judgment must include a “Statement of Undisputed Facts.” Local Rule 260(a). Furthermore, this Court's local rule requires each motion of summary judgment to include “a ‘Statement of Undisputed Facts’ that shall enumerate discretely each of the specific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.