(PC) Van Huisen v. Lawrence Livermore Lab
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 2:23-cv-01925-DAD-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER LAWRENCE LIVERMORE LAB, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has also brought two motions for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 2 and 4), a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) (ECF No. 7), and a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 11). This order will address plaintiff’s motions and screen plaintiff’s complaint. Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Extension of Time District…