Escobedo

Escobedo v. Vang

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20231:23-cv-00207California763 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-0207 JLT BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING IN

v. PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING

CHENG VANG, dba SUSHIYAKI, et al., THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THIS

CASE

Defendants. (Docs. 22, 25) 16 Jose Escobedo seeks default judgment against the defendants—including Cheng Vang doing business as Sushiyaki and Tou Pao Yang doing business as Sushiyaki— for violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Doc. 22.) Although Plaintiff included claims for violations of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act and the state’s Health & Safety Code, he did not request default judgment on the claims. Rather, Plaintiff requested the claims be dismissed without prejudice if the default judgment was granted on the ADA claim. (Doc. 22-1 at 2, n.1.) The magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be granted in 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.