1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES LEONDARD RICALLS, No. 2:23-cv-00771-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 P. ANDREW, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. On June 12, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915A and dismissed it with leave to amend. ECF No. 4. The court explained the 20 deficiencies therein and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to 21 cure the deficiencies. Id. The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would 22 result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Rather than file the amended complaint, 23 plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend. The court, on September 1, 2023, informed plaintiff 24 he had already been granted leave to amend and directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint 25 within 30 days. ECF No. 8. The time for doing so has now passed and plaintiff has still not filed 26 an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that plaintiff 27 is unable or unwilling to cure the defects in the complaint. 28 //// 1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a district judge to 2 || this action. 3 It is further RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for the 4 || reasons set forth in the June 12, 2023 screening order (ECF No. 4). 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 7 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 8 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 9 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 10 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 11 | parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 12 | appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 13 | v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 14 a fo Zp og 15 || Dated: November 28, 2023

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28