Dickson
Dickson v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLENN DICKSON, individually, and on No. 2:23-cv-01812 MCE AC behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 v.
RHEEM MANUFACTURING
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, and 16 DOES 1through 10 inclusive, 17 Defendants.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 6), is APPROVED and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 1. Requests to seal documents shall be made by motion before the same judge who will decide the matter related to that request to seal. 2. The designation of documents (including transcripts of testimony) as confidential pursuant to this order does not automatically entitle the parties to file such a document with the court under seal. Parties are advised that any request to seal documents in this district is governed by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 141. In brief, Local Rule 141 provides that documents may only 28 be sealed by a written order of the court after…