(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20232:22-cv-01761California1,078 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY LOVE, 2:22-cv-01761-KJM-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. TRI-COUNTIES BANK, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding with the assistance of counsel, filed this fee-paid complaint on October 6, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) On August 2, 2023, plaintiff’s counsel moved to withdraw after plaintiff had ceased communication. (ECF No. 20.) On September 8, 2023, the assigned district judge granted plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw and ordered plaintiff to retain new counsel or indicate plaintiff's intent to proceed pro se within thirty days of receiving a copy of the court’s order. (ECF No. 21 at 3.) When plaintiff failed to respond to the court’s order, the assigned district judge referred this pro se action to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) for all further proceedings. (ECF No. 23.) I. Order to Show Cause On November 2, 2023, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing why this 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.