Mohyuddin

(PC) Shepard v. Mohyuddin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20232:20-cv-01445California655 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL SHEPARD, No. 2:20-cv-01445-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND STAY THE

v. CASE KELSO, et al., ECF No. 55 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff moves for the appointment of counsel and to stay this matter. ECF No. 55. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court lacks the authority to require an attorney to represent plaintiff. See Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). The court can request the voluntary assistance of counsel. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) (“The court may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel”); Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. But without a means to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.