Unknown

(PC) Castro v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20232:23-cv-01463California1,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE CASTRO, No. 2:23-cv-1463-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing the initial complaint, plaintiff has filed an amended complaint and requests to proceed in forma paupers. ECF Nos. 3, 4, 10. The court will grant the in forma pauperis application and screen the amended complaint, which supersedes the original. Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). //// //// Screening Standards Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.