Amps

Amps v. Magsig

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20231:23-cv-01260California427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRAVARIS AMPS, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-1260 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND

NATHAN MAGSIG, ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE

) THE CASE Defendant. ) ) (Doc. 5) )

Travaris Amps initiated this action by filing a complaint on August 22, 2023. (Doc. 1.) However, Plaintiff did not pay the Court’s filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, the Court ordered Plaintiff to apply to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. (Doc. 2.) After Plaintiff failed to do so, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order to show cause within 21 days why the action should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with a court order, failure to prosecute, and failure to pay the filing fee. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff did not file any response,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.