(PC) Jones v. High Desert State Prison Policy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20232:23-cv-02142California277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYNE ELIJAH JONES, No. 2:23-cv-2142 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants.

17 On October 17, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend within 30 18 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the court’s October 17, 2023, order would 19 result in dismissal. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 court judge to this case; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.