Scalia

(PC) Beckett v. Scalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20231:20-cv-01468California604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW H. BECKETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01468-JLT-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v.

DEFENDANTS FOLLOWING

SCALIA, et al., SCREENING OF PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

17

19 Plaintiff Matthew H. Beckett is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On October 31, 2023, the Court issued its Third Screening Order. (Doc. 29.) The Court found Plaintiff’s second amended complaint plausibly alleged Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Scalia, Madrigal and Hernandez (Claim One), Eighth Amendment failure to protect/failure to intervene claims against Defendant Hackworth (Claim One), and Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Scalia, Madrigal, Hernandez and Hackworth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.