Rhea

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON R. BRANNIGAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-00725-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

v. ACTION RHEA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE FIRST AMENDED

Defendants. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

CLAIM ECF No. 13 18 19 20 Plaintiff brings this section 1983 case against defendant Rhea and two “Does” for deprivation of his personal property. ECF No. 13 at 3. The claim is, for the reasons stated below, not cognizable. Given that the deficiency in this complaint is identical to its predecessor, I find that further leave to amend is unwarranted and will recommend dismissal without leave to amend. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief…