Scalia

(PC) Beckett v. Scalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20231:20-cv-01468California1,876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW H. BECKETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01468-JLT-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v.

ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

SCALIA, et al., OBEY COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. 30)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL

18 (Doc. 31)

20 Plaintiff Matthew H. Beckett is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On October 31, 2023, the Court issued its Third Screening Order. (Doc. 29.) The Court found Plaintiff plausibly alleged cognizable claims against several named Defendants but had failed to state any other cognizable claim. (Id. at 9-18.) Plaintiff was ordered to respond within 21 days of the date of service of the order. (Id. at 18-19.) 28 On November 29, 2023, when more than 21 days elapsed without Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.