CDCR

(PC) Kjeldergaard v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20232:23-cv-02013California275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

, 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICKOLAS GORDON No. 2:23-cv-2013 CKD P

KJELDERGAARD,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CDCR, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On October 17, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the court’s October 17, 2023, order would result in dismissal. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.