Doe

Doe v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20232:21-cv-01438California1,701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIA DOE, et al, 2:21-cv-01438-MCE-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiffs’ motion to compel filed on November 8, 2023, and the parties’ joint statement on the discovery dispute (ECF Nos. 68, 69) are before the court. The parties appeared for a hearing via videoconference on November 29, 2023. Ezra Kautz and Chelsea Lalancette appeared for the plaintiffs; John Whitefleet appeared for defendants County of Sacramento, Sacramento Sheriff’s Office, and Darryl Roderick (“County defendants”). I. Background The plaintiffs in this action allege they were coerced into vacating their apartment without legal process by Sacramento County Sheriff’s Deputy Darryl Roderick, who refused to provide interpretation. (ECF No. 69 at 6.)1 The second amended complaint asserts causes of action against the County defendants for wrongful eviction; deprivation of property without due process of law 27 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.