(HC) Caetano v. United States of America
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20231:23-cv-01648California649 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NATHANIEL DWAYNE CAETANO, Case No. 1:23-cv-01648-SKO
Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF
MANDAMUS
Respondents.
16 On November 27, 2023, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361 in this Court. The petition is frivolous and nonsensical. Therefore, the Court will recommend the petition be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DISCUSSION The All Writs Act, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), provides that “[t]he Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.” The federal mandamus statute set forth at 28 U.S.C. § 1361 provides: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the…