(HC) Potter v. State of Idaho

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20232:23-cv-02489California616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ONIS CARRABINE POTTER, Case No. 2:23-cv-02489-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS STATE OF IDAHO, ECF No. 6 Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE PETITION BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A VIABLE CLAIM ECF No. 1 18 Petitioner, an inmate in the Sacramento County Jail, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 19 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He acknowledges, however, that he has not yet been convicted. ECF No. 1 at 20 1. Thus, he is not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I recommend that his petition be 21 denied. I will grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. 22 The petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 23 Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned to the habeas proceeding must examine 24 the habeas petition and order a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.