Singh

Singh v. Hyundai Motor America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20232:23-cv-01840California3,782 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASBIR SINGH, et al., No. 2:23-cv-01840-DAD-AC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO REMAND

HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, et al., (Doc. No. 6) Defendants.

16 This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to remand this action to the Solano County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 6.) Having reviewed the motion and the defendants’ opposition thereto, the court finds the pending motion suitable for decision on the papers. For the reasons explained below, the court will deny plaintiffs’ motion to remand. BACKGROUND On March 29, 2023, plaintiffs filed this action against defendants Hyundai Motor America (“Hyundai”), Hyundai of Vacaville, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, in the Solano County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1-2 at 1.) In their complaint, plaintiffs allege that on or around May 14, 2022, they purchased a 2022 Hyundai Sonata (the “subject vehicle”) that was manufactured or 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.