(PC) Montgomery v. Madera Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20231:23-cv-00919California3,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAULINE MONTGOMERY, No. 1:23-cv-00919-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION MADERA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION al., RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 11)

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on June 20, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) 20 On September 28, 2023, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to 21 state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. 22 (ECF No. 10.) 23 Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the September 28, 24 2023 order. Therefore, on November 7, 2023, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show 25 cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.