Cisneros
(PC) Sealey v. Cisneros
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 8 DEAN MARTIN SEALEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00253-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS
FROM PARTIES REGARDING
SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY v. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
T. CISNEROS, ET AL., Defendants. 16 Dean Martin Sealey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint and allowed at least one claim 18 to proceed past screening. (ECF Nos. 5, 7). Parties have been ordered to confer and consider 19 participating in an early scheduling conference. (ECF No. 27.) As directed by the Court, 20 Defendants timely filed a notice opting out of the early settlement conference. (ECF No. 31.) The 21 case will now proceed to litigation. Before scheduling this case, however, the Court will require 22 each party to submit a statement regarding the schedule and discovery matters. 23 The statements regarding the schedule and discovery shall be filed within thirty days from 24 the date of…