Cisneros

(PC) Sealey v. Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20231:23-cv-00253California640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 DEAN MARTIN SEALEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00253-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS

FROM PARTIES REGARDING

SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY v. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

T. CISNEROS, ET AL., Defendants. 16 Dean Martin Sealey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint and allowed at least one claim 18 to proceed past screening. (ECF Nos. 5, 7). Parties have been ordered to confer and consider 19 participating in an early scheduling conference. (ECF No. 27.) As directed by the Court, 20 Defendants timely filed a notice opting out of the early settlement conference. (ECF No. 31.) The 21 case will now proceed to litigation. Before scheduling this case, however, the Court will require 22 each party to submit a statement regarding the schedule and discovery matters. 23 The statements regarding the schedule and discovery shall be filed within thirty days from 24 the date of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.