Rosen
(PC) Hood v. Rosen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED FITZGERALD HOOD, Case No. 2:23-cv-01980-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER FINDING THAT
THE COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A
v. COGNIZABLE CLAIM AND GRANTING
AN OPPORTUNITY TO AMEND
ROSEN, et al., ECF No. 1 Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS AND DENYING HIS MOTION
TO APPOINT COUNSEL ECF Nos. 2 & 8 19 20 Plaintiff, an inmate at the Sierra Conservation Center, alleges that defendants Anderson, Rosen, Mara, Patton, Klein, and Rossi—all officers with the Roseville police department—and Rosen, a physician at the Sutter Roseville Medical Center, violated his rights in varied and ambiguous ways. The complaint, as articulated, does not meet federal pleading standards. I will give plaintiff leave to amend and will also grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No.…