(PC) Edwards v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20231:23-cv-01180California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KADEEM EDWARDS, 1:23-cv-01180-ADA-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

REHABILITATION,

Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On November 6, 2023, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 10.) It found Plaintiff stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Jane Doe, L.V.N., but failed to state any other cognizable claim against any other defendant. (Id. at 4-7.) Plaintiff was directed to do one of the following within 21 days: (1) notify the Court he did not wish to file a first amended complaint and instead was willing to proceed only on the Eighth Amendment deliberate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.