Cates

(HC) Magee v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20231:21-cv-01598California953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOUIS MAGEE, JR., Case No. 1:21-cv-01598-NODJ-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTIONS TO SUPPLEMENT AND/OR

v. AMEND WITHOUT PREJUDICE OAK SMITH, ACTING WARDEN, (Doc. Nos. 32, 33, 36, 37) Respondent. 16 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s various motions filed on September 22, 2023, September 29, 2023, October 3, 2023, and October 12, 2023, seeking to either supplement or amend his pending petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. Nos. 32, 33, 36, 37). Specifically, Petitioner’s first-filed motion consists of a single page and seeks “permission to file [a] supplement to amend exhausted remedies.” (Doc. No. 32). Plaintiff’s second-filed motion comprises a single sentence “requesting permission” “to amend a supplement.” (Doc. No. 33). Respondent filed an opposition to these motions arguing Petitioner did not identify the claim(s) he seeks to amend or the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.