(SS)(PS) McCoy v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20232:23-cv-00881California300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEILA MARIE MCCOY, No. 2:23-cv-881-DJC-KJN Plaintiff, (ECF No. 12) v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 LEILA MARIE MCCOY, No. 2:23-cv-882-DJC-KJN 17 Plaintiff, (ECF No. 15) 18 v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, Defendant.

On October 19, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 12 in the -881 case; ECF No. 15 in the -882 case), which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. , 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.