(PC) Cortijo v. St. Andre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20232:23-cv-00454California395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DEANGELO CORTIJO, No. 2:23-cv-0454 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ST. ANDRE, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants denied him the ability to make phone calls, retaliated against him, and discriminated against him in violation of his constitutional rights. By order dated October 10, 2023, the undersigned screened and dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and advised that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, requested additional time to file an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.