Arviza

(PC) Vazquez-Gonzalez v. Arviza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20231:23-cv-00925California3,950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IVAN VAZQUEZ-GONZALEZ, No. 1:23-cv-00925-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION M. ARVIZA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 11)

18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 19 to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotic Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 20 Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on June 20, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) 21 On September 26, 2023, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to 22 state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. 23 (ECF No. 10.) 24 Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the September 26, 25 2023 order. Therefore, on November 7, 2023, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show 26 cause why the action should not be dismissed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.