Castillo

(PC) Washington v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20231:23-cv-01095California635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01095-JLT-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS FOLLOWING SCREENING

A. CASTILLO, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On November 16, 2023, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 14.) The Court found Plaintiff plausibly alleged an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Castillo-Barajas in his or her individual capacity only but had failed to allege any other cognizable claim against any other named Defendant. (Id. at 5-12.) Plaintiff was to elect one of the following options within 21 days of the date of service of the order: (1) to notify the Court in writing that he did not wish to file a first amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.