Sheehan
(PC) Trevino v. Sheehan
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20232:23-cv-00235California1,005 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT TREVINO, Case No. 2:23-cv-00235-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER FINDING THAT THE
COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A
v. VIABLE CLAIM AGAINST ANY
DEFENDANT AND GRANTING LEAVE
X. SHEEHAN, et al., TO AMEND Defendants. ECF No. 1 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff brings this section 1983 case against defendants Sheehan, Schneider, Hickey, Comeau, Cano, and De La Cruz, all officials at various state prisons. ECF No. 1 at 2. He alleges that these defendants have violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for filing a case in the Northern District of California. Id. at 7. Having reviewed the complaint, I find that his allegations are insufficient to state a viable claim against any defendant. I will allow him leave to amend.
28 Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief…