(PC)Roberson

(PC)Roberson v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20231:22-cv-00833California8,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MORRIS ROBERSON, No. 1:22-cv-00833-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’

v. EXHAUSTION MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

CDCR, et al., (ECF No. 29) Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Morris Roberson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies, filed July 3, 2023. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants Chavez, Salazer, Kyt, Lirio and Furlong, and failure to intervene claim against Defendants Valero, Rodriguez, Charles, Furlong, Acebedo, Lirio, Hunter Loza, and Gonzalez. (ECF No. 12.) Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on February 17, 2023. (ECF No. 23.) As…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.