(PC) Johnson v. Superior Court Of California Kings County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20231:23-cv-01124California1,150 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DERRICK L. JOHNSON, No. 1:23-cv-01124-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KINGS COUNTY, et al., RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOF Defendants. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 16 (ECF No. 6)

18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on July 18, 2023. On July 24, 2023, the Court 20 issued an order directing Plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis 21 or pay the $402.00 filing fee within 30 days. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the 22 Court’s order. Therefore, on September 5, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why 23 the action should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute and failure to 24 comply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.