Emmert

(PC) Brown v. Emmert

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20232:22-cv-01001California288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK ANTHONY BROWN, No. 2:22-cv-1001 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS W. EMMERT, et al., Defendants. 16 On February 21, 2023, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve plaintiff’s complaint on defendant Lieu. The Marshal was not able to serve defendant Lieu with the information provided by plaintiff. Because service of process has not been accomplished with respect to defendant Lieu, and it does not appear likely that it will be, the court will recommend that defendant Lieu be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 1. Defendant Lieu be dismissed from this action; and 2. This case be closed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.