(PS)Douglas

(PS)Douglas v. Walt Disney

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20232:23-cv-02328California286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANJON MAREQUIS DOUGLAS, No. 2:23-cv-2328-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER WALT DISNEY 20TH CENTURY FOX

STUDIOS,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 18, 2023 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.