(PC) Hill v. Escobar et.al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20232:21-cv-02118California691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:21-cv-02118-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE

ESCOBAR, et al., ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

OCTOBER 24, 2023 ORDER

Defendants. (Doc. No. 30) 16 Plaintiff Cymeyon Hill is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 24, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order directing plaintiff to provide additional information to enable service of the complaint and summons on the defendants named in this action because plaintiff had not provided sufficient information for the U.S. Marshals to serve them. (Doc. No. 28.) On November 6, 2023, plaintiff filed a document with the title “Motion for Reconsideration by the District Court of the Magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.