(PC) Peterson v. Alameda County Sheriff Dept.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARY LEE PETERSON, No. 2:23-cv-00218-DJC-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., et al., 15 Defendants.

17 By order filed August 28, 2023, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed 18 and granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. The thirty day period has now 19 expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s 20 order. 21 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 22 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 23 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 24 the party is fully effective. 25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 26 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 1…