(PS) Claire v. County of Sutter
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROUBLE P. CLAIRE, No. 2:22-cv-0780 TLN AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER SARA M. HOLLIS, Defendant. 16 This case is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to compel the only remaining defendant, Sara M. Hollis, to comply with her discovery obligations in this matter, including her obligation to produce documents and appear for a deposition. ECF No. 40. This discovery motion was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1). Defendant Hollis, who is appearing in pro se, has refused to participate in discovery and the motion was filed without a joint statement pursuant to Local Rule 251(e). ECF No. 40 at 6. I. Relevant Background This case was initiated against multiple defendants, including pro se defendant Sara M. Hollis. ECF No. 1 (initial complaint); ECF No. 4 (amended complaint). Plaintiff brought federal civil rights claims against Sutter County and two Sutter County…