(SS) Carrisoza v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20231:21-cv-00646California3,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATALIE CARRISOZA, Case No. 1:21-cv-00646-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING

v. DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, REMANDING CASE TO COMMISSIONER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY

SECURITY, (Doc. Nos. 16, 17) Defendant. 17 Natalie Carrisoza (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 16-18). For the reasons stated, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denies Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and orders this matter remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.