Hicks

(PC) Madden v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20231:18-cv-00255California1,940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MADDEN, Successor-in- Case No. 1:18-cv-00255-NODJ-BAM (PC) Interest to Ryan P. Madden, et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE, v. AND TO FILE A STAY OF BRIEFING ON, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY HICKS, et al., JUDGMENT 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 76)

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR

PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT OR FILE MOTION TO

COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES

FORTY-FIVE (45) DAY DEADLINE

20 I. Introduction Plaintiff Michael Madden and Kathleen “Kathy” Madden (“Plaintiffs”), as Successors-in- Interest to Ryan P. Madden, are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Hicks for excessive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.