Hicks
(PC) Madden v. Hicks
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20231:18-cv-00255California1,940 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MADDEN, Successor-in- Case No. 1:18-cv-00255-NODJ-BAM (PC) Interest to Ryan P. Madden, et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE, v. AND TO FILE A STAY OF BRIEFING ON, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY HICKS, et al., JUDGMENT 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 76)
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OR FILE MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES
FORTY-FIVE (45) DAY DEADLINE
20 I. Introduction Plaintiff Michael Madden and Kathleen “Kathy” Madden (“Plaintiffs”), as Successors-in- Interest to Ryan P. Madden, are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Hicks for excessive…