Emergency Restoration & Cleaning, Inc. v. Emergency Restoration Co., Inc.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20232:22-cv-01981California1,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMERGENCY RESTORATION & No. 2:22–cv–1981–CKD

CLEANING, INC,

ORDER; FINDINGS AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v.

EMERGENCY RESTORATION

COMPANY, INC. et al, Defendants. 17 On September 27, 2023, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff filed a timely response, informing the court of ongoing settlement negotiations and indicating that by November 1, 2023, plaintiff would either file a dismissal of this action or pursue default judgment. (ECF No. 11 at 2.) In light of plaintiff’s representations, the court discharged the Order to Show Cause. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff did not pursue dismissal or default judgment by the November 1, 2023 deadline. Therefore, on November 16, 2023, the court ordered plaintiff to inform the court of the status of

1 This action was filed on November 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.