Jones

(PC) Mills v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20231:23-cv-01214California416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS K. MILLS, No. 1:23-cv-1214 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING

v. CLAIM ZACHERY JONES, et al. (Doc. 16) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that he stated a single cognizable a cognizable claim for excessive force but no other claims. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint or to notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the excessive force claim. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff notified the Court he would not file an amended complaint and was “willing to proceed on the claim found to be cognizable.” (Doc. 13 at 1; Doc. 14 at 1.) The magistrate judge then issued Findings and Recommendations, reiterating the finding Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim of excessive force and recommending the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.