Shirley

(PC) Adams v. Shirley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20231:23-cv-01100California3,965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY ADAMS, No. 1:23-cv-01100-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION HEATHER SHIRLEY, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendant. (ECF No. 13)

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on July 21, 2023. 19 On August 11, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found no cognizable claim, 20 and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff failed to 21 file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the Court’s order. Therefore, on September 22 20, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. 23 (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff filed a response on October 3, 2023. (ECF No. 11.) In his response, 24 Plaintiff stated that he was not able to file an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.