(PC) Beaton v. IRS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, No. 2:23-cv-0669 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

IRS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a former state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) assessed a $5,000 penalty and improperly withheld his economic impact payments. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will deny plaintiff’s motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7 and recommend that this action be dismissed. I. Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7 Plaintiff states he is filing a motion under Rule 7(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.1. (ECF No. 6 at 1.) He further states “a mistake has been made by this court or [him].” (Id.) He states that on his compliant it states (Employment Discrimination) but it’s about an act of U.S. Congress which was signed…