Jones

(PC) Mills v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20231:23-cv-01214California638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS K. MILLS, No. 1:23-cv-01214-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED ZACHERY JONES, et al. (ECF No. 22) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed December 7, 2023. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff’s motion must be denied. This action is proceeding against Defendants Zachery Jones and Javier Rivera for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. I. DISCUSSION “The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). A party moving for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.