Aung

(PC) Wilhelm v. Aung

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20232:22-cv-02323California1,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE WILHELM, No. 2:22-cv-02323 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SANDAR AUNG, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”), proceeds pro se and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion seeking a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction, filed on June 26, 2023, is before the court. (ECF No. 11) I. Background The events at issue took place at MCSP. In the operative first amended complaint, plaintiff alleges he has serious prostate and kidney issues of which the defendant, Dr. Aung, was aware. (ECF No. 8 at 6.) On September 16, 2020, Dr. Aung examined plaintiff’s stomach which was “extended and hard.” (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff alleges it was obvious even to a layperson that there was a serious problem, but Dr. Aung took no action, which caused plaintiff to suffer further problems with his kidney disease which could have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.