Block

Block v. Salem

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20231:22-cv-01596California619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENDRIK BLOCK, No. 1:22-cv-1596 JLT BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING IN

v. PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING

MOHAMED NASSER SALEM, THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THIS individually and dba QUICK MART, CASE 15 Defendant. (Docs. 14, 18) 16 Hendrik Block seeks default judgment against Mohamed Nasser Salem, individually and dba Quick Mart, for violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Doc. 14.) The magistrate judge found default judgment was appropriate for Plaintiff’s claim arising under the ADA, and recommended the requested injunctive relief be granted. (Doc. 18 at 4-9.) In addition, the magistrate judge found an award of fees and costs was appropriate, and recommended Plaintiff be awarded attorneys’ fees in the modified amount of $1784.000 and litigation costs in the amount of $804.26, for a total award of $2,588.26. (Id. at 9-12.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.