(PC) Van Huisen v. Clinton Admin.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 2:23-cv-1596 DJC KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On September 25, 2023, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On November 15, 2023, the undersigned granted plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint or inform the court whether he intends to stand on his first amended complaint. (ECF No. 31.) On November 27, 2023, plaintiff filed a request for extension of time to amend (ECF No. 32); however, this request was directed to the September 22, 2023 order, and by then, plaintiff had already filed an amended complaint. On November 30, 2023, plaintiff filed a response to the November 15, 2023 order, indicating he intended to stand on his amended complaint. Thus, the motion for extension of time is denied as moot, and the court now screens…