Matteson
(HC) Jacob v. Matteson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTHONY WAYNE JACOB, No. 2:22-cv-2051 DJC DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER MATTESON, Respondent. 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. Petitioner argues the court should grant habeas relief because: (1) the lack of sufficient evidence to support the imposition of a firearm enhancement; (2) the lack of sufficient evidence to support the special circumstance; (3) the failure to declare a mistrial; (4) the failure to consider petitioner’s ability to pay before imposing restitution and fines; (5) the ineffective assistance of counsel; (6) petitioner’s actual and factual innocence. (ECF No. 1 at 47-75.) Petitioner filed a motion for stay concurrently with the petition for writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 2.) Petitioner stated that a stay was needed so that grounds five and six of the petition could be…